20 minutes to buy a tattie! Why self-service tech needs to be human-first

Insights

20 minutes to buy a tattie! Why self-service tech needs to be human-first

Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, right? But what happens when self-serve systems become more of a barrier than a benefit?

 

In our latest blog, Mantle’s Graeme Riddoch discusses how self-serve technology is often designed without understanding the user in mind and how they engage. From supermarket tills to pension scheme portals, the promise of self-service often falls short of its potential, leaving users frustrated and longing for human assistance. Graeme discusses the alternative member self-service option to help solve these issues.


I was in a Coop in the North East of Scotland recently standing at the self-service check outs.


I watched an elderly man battling the technology. He kept putting a solitary potato ( tattie in the local tongue)  in and out of his shopping bag, as prompted by the checkout. The till couldn’t register that he had put it in.


Eventually he gave up shouting “20 minutes to buy a tattie,” watched on by a long queue of customers waiting for a manned till. There were six self-serve checkouts in the shop and no one was using them, bar this one poor chap.


It’s often the case that self-serve technology doesn’t appear to have been designed with humans in mind and how they try and do things. Anything that’s a barrier to getting the job done means that people give up and revert to looking for a human for help.


This is all too true in the case of getting Pension Scheme members online to self-serve. There  are many benefits for both the member and the Scheme.


Firstly the member can get what they need in their own time on the device of their choice. There’s a massive trend to online banking at the moment with apps on smartphones the preferred vehicle. No reason why that shouldn’t be the ambition for Defined Benefit (DB) pensions too.


From the scheme’s perspective there are clear benefits, more engaged members and resource freed up as members look after themselves. Of course self-serve wont suit everyone, but the easier it is for members the more likely they are to use it.


So what are the barriers to getting people online and looking after themselves?

 

The key thing to get right is the registration process, if it’s too difficult then people will disengage.


Typically pension websites use two factor authentication, user name & password with a one time code sent to the members device. It’s clearly vital to ensure that it’s the member trying to access their benefits, but it can be difficult to navigate.


With no clear imperative to register some members won’t bother. Typical registration rates for pension websites vary but 25% is a good outcome.


If members do get registered the next issue is logging back in. Generally pension websites aren’t heavily used so visits can be infrequent. Unless the member has saved their log in credentials they may struggle. We saw one scheme where around 50% of the inbound call traffic was for password resets. So what’s the alternative?

 

Member self-service from Mantle

 

At Mantle we developed a DB Smartphone app, My Pocket Pension, some four years ago. One of the key design principles was “easy to register.” Our best uptake so far is 70% for one Scheme.


The secret? No password, username or one time code, although the registration process is just as secure.


A QR code takes the customer to the relevant app store to download the app. The code is personalised and acts as a password, when scanned in the app. Next proof point is the customers NINO. When entered that’s registration complete. Selecting a 4 digit PIN makes it easy for the customer to get back in.


One minute registration and the job’s done, more time back for the daily shop!


To find out more about Mantle’s My Pocket Pension app, visit our website or see it in action, visit https://vimeo.com/587813490.

Picture of Graeme Riddoch

Graeme Riddoch

< Share my blog

Lets talk about you​

To discuss how we can help with your company pensions and challenges, please get in touch. 

 

Linen Loft
27-37 Adelaide Street
Belfast , BT2 8FE UK
+44 28 9041 2888

The real cost of McCloud

Insights

The real cost of McCloud

 

When pension reform backfires, everyone pays the price. The McCloud remedy, initially designed to reduce public sector pension costs, has instead created an administrative nightmare that’s driving up expenses and leaving members frustrated. What started as a well-intentioned cost-saving measure has morphed into a perfect storm of technical limitations, staffing challenges, and member confusion. Traditional pension management platforms simply weren’t built to handle these dual calculations, creating a cascade of costly problems. Mantle’s Graeme Riddoch discusses the true impact of McCloud on pension schemes and those who depend on them.

 

What is the McCloud Remedy?

 

What most people know about the McCloud remedy is that it’s a Public Sector Defined Benefits (DB) Pensions issue that impacts some members. At its heart were reforms designed to curb the cost of Public Sector Pensions by changing accrual to Career Average.  This generally produces lower benefits than Final Salary, thus saving money.

 

Ultimately, a judge found the changes to be discriminatory and the upshot in simple terms is that both career average and final salary calculations need to be run. LGPS members are presented with “the better of” for their circumstances. Local Government members get both calculations and choose.

 

So what started out as an exercise designed to reduce costs has had the opposite effect.

 

What is the impact of the McCloud remedy?

 

One of the biggest problems is having to run both career average and final salary calculations. The platforms running the schemes were set up for final salary calculations, not career average. Some legacy platforms struggle to fully automate one set of calculations never mind both!

 

A huge amount of money is therefore being burnt just in this area. We recently came across one large scheme having to run career average calculations on spreadsheets and then manually merge the results with the Final Salary calculations. The net effect was to pretty much double the number of staff required to support the scheme, with the accompanying cost.

 

Consider serving data to Pensions Dashboards, some platforms struggle with one ERI calculation, never mind two.

 

The other real-world impact of McCloud is on members. If you can’t automate calculations then getting estimates of benefits is a long painful process. Also, forget member self-serve.

 

Communication is a real issue, just go on the LGPS website and look at how much copy is dedicated to trying to explain things to members. DB pensions are complicated enough to start with!

 

There are even more fundamental consequences. The BBC ran a story recently about people unable to get a divorce. The barrier being an inability of the actuary to value the benefits to allow for a pension sharing order.

 

The problems of a large LGPS fund in the Midlands are well documented with Martin Lewis wading in. The fund in question was struggling so badly that some members hadn’t received their pension 5 months after retirement.

 

So what’s the remedy? Well, the technology underpinning many schemes isn’t up to the job. To be fair the platforms were never designed to run parallel calculations. Few are capable of calculating Transfer Values, on one basis, never mind two.

 

Better is possible however. Mantle’s pension management platform runs both career average and final salary in real time. It also supports dual opposite sex records for GMP as well as live transfer values, refreshed daily.

 

And the cost? Well for one scheme we estimated a 50% reduction in staff costs and a transformation in terms of the service to the member. That’s the real cost of McCloud!

 

How Mantle’s Pension Management Platform can help.

 

By upgrading to modern pension management technology platforms designed to handle dual calculations effortlessly, schemes can dramatically reduce operational costs while delivering superior service to members.

 

Explore how Mantle’s real-time calculation capabilities can transform your scheme administration, cut costs by up to 50%, and give your members the responsive service they deserve. Contact us today at enquiries@mantleservices.com to learn how we can help you navigate the McCloud challenge more efficiently.

Picture of Graeme Riddoch

Graeme Riddoch

< Share my blog

Lets talk about you​

To discuss how we can help with your company pensions and challenges, please get in touch. 

 

Linen Loft
27-37 Adelaide Street
Belfast , BT2 8FE UK
+44 28 9041 2888

Embracing change, why don’t pension schemes re-platform?

Insights

Embracing change, why don't pension schemes re-platform?

In the ever-evolving world of pension management, staying ahead of the curve is crucial. Yet, many pension schemes find themselves stuck with outdated platforms, reluctant to make the leap to more modern solutions. Mantle’s Graeme Riddoch explores the reasons behind this and presents a compelling case for why re-platforming could be the key to unlocking efficiency, cost savings, and improved member experiences. 

 

Why don’t pension schemes re-platform, there are a number of reasons, 

  • Not uncomfortable enough to move 
  • Lack of awareness of better solutions 
  • Perceived high cost of transition 
  • Concerns about impact on the admin team 

 

The comfort zone

On the first point it’s clear that many schemes can be far from satisfied with their current provider but not so dissatisfied that they are actively seeking to move. Often a platform going out of support can be the trigger. 

Believe in better

From first-hand experience of talking to pensions managers there’s a low expectation of what can be achieved by moving platform and the problems that can be solved. When they realise that better is possible, they get very interested. 

Too expensive

The biggest barrier however can be the anticipated cost to move. 

 

I spoke to one pensions manager running a scheme with around 20,000 members. When they moved to their current platform some 10 years ago the cost was in the region of £1M! However, it’s important to consider that technology has evolved, and modern solutions often offer more cost-effective transition processes. 

Internal cost to change

It’s not just the transition costs but the impact on staff and resourcing the transition internally. One scheme we spoke to found, the move to their current platform very hard as a lot of the sign off on calculation testing fell on the admin team, who were flat out running the scheme on a day-to-day basis. They vowed never to move again! However, modern platforms have streamlined these processes, significantly reducing the burden on internal teams. 

A modern solution

Mantle relative to many legacy platforms can transform the experience for administrator and member alike. Mantle offers: 

  • 100% calculation automation
  • Integrated payroll, treasury and accounts  
  • Integrated actuarial for live valuations
  • Member self-serve in the bundle
  • Pensions Dashboards ready 

 

This creates efficiency, saves money and delivers a better experience for administrators and ultimately the member. 

The cost effective transition

We know from clients that our transition costs are a fraction of others. There’s a number of reasons for this. 

A highly configurable solution. No development required or black box coding of calculations for even the most complex benefit structures. 

 

No rocket scientists required. Skilled administrators can set up Mantle reducing setup costs. 

Making it easy

Moving platform is undoubtedly a significant undertaking for any scheme, even if the benefits are clear. 

Calculation testing can have a big dependency on the in house team. 

 

Wind forward to a modern system with a different approach to onboarding and the cost to transition is a fraction of what was paid previously and the call on the admin team minimised. 

Embracing the future of re-platforming

Don’t let the fear of change hold your scheme back. Explore the possibilities of modern pension management software and take the first step towards a more efficient, cost-effective, and member-focused future. Your administrators—and more importantly, your members—will thank you for it. 

 

For further information on re-platforming and what Mantle can offer, visit our website www.mantleservices.com or contact us at enquiries@mantleservices.com  

< Share my blog

Lets talk about you​

To discuss how we can help with your company pensions and challenges, please get in touch. 

 

Linen Loft
27-37 Adelaide Street
Belfast , BT2 8FE UK
+44 28 9041 2888

Designed for Humans: The Key to Successful Self-Serve Systems

Insights

Designed for humans: The key to successful self-serve systems

Nowadays, self-service technologies are becoming ever-present. From airport bag drops to pension management systems, these systems promise convenience and efficiency. However, as many frustrated users can attest, self-service solutions often fall short of their promise.

 

 

 

How not to do it

Picture this. 6.00 am Gatwick airport, Easyjet self-service bag drop area. An object lesson in how to get self-serve technology wrong. Nearly half of all the bag drops were flashing red and customers were tetchily waiting for the one customer service assistant!

 

 

To be fair, matters weren’t improved by our flight from Bristol being cancelled the evening before just as we were about to board. Cue a mad scramble, a £370 taxi journey and a sleepless night in a Premier Inn.

Anyway, those designing self-serve systems all too often ignore the human dimension, expecting people to behave rationally or as they would like them to.

 

 

The issue with the bag drop was that the baggage tag had to be attached to the top of a bag or the scanner couldn’t read it. Most people just attached it at the end of the bag.

 

 You do wonder if the designers trialled the system on real sleep deprived customers to see how they fared?

So, what does that mean for pensions?

The current trend is to try and get members online serving themselves, reducing the call on valuable administration resource and improving the customer experience.

 

A lot of time and money goes into the design of websites, but there’s a key point of failure meaning that some people may not register or if they do, they may not revisit the site to use it. That’s the registration process itself.

The traditional approach is Username Password and one-time code. If customers navigate this, then the next barrier can be using the site after first registration. Pension websites aren’t used on a frequent basis and all too often people forget their login credentials.

 

I recently spent an entire train journey to London trying to reset a password for a site I used infrequently.

We saw one scheme recently where 50% of all inbound calls were for password resets.

The net effect of making it hard for customers is that they give up and pick up the phone to get what they need. A bad outcome for everyone.

 

So what’s the solution to make it easy?

We developed a phone app a few years ago with a key design principle being easy to access.

People got very used to scanning QR codes with their phone cameras during Covid. It’s a quick and easy way to download apps or access content via a smartphone.

 

So why not personalise the QR code and make that the password? That’s what we did.

 

The customer then enters their own National Insurance Number and selects a 4-digit PIN, like a banking app. The phone is tagged to the member so all they need to do next time is use the 4-digit PIN.

 

Customer satisfaction with the process has been in excess of 90% and uptake of the app well above that of traditional websites, in excess of 70% for one scheme. We are also seeing up to 20% of customers who have the app, using it on a monthly basis.

 

So, the learning from all this is to design systems and processes that work with human nature and around how people behave, not how you’d like them to! When we design for humans as they are, rather than as we wish them to be, everyone benefits – users and service providers alike.

How Mantle Services can help

By prioritising ease of use, considering real-world scenarios, and embracing innovative approaches like personalised QR codes, we can create self-service systems that truly serve their purpose.

 

If you’d like further information on how Mantle Services can help your organisation engage with its members via self-serve capabilities, visit our website here or contact us for further information at enquiries@mantleservices.com

 

< Share my blog

Lets talk about you​

To discuss how we can help with your company pensions and challenges, please get in touch. 

 

Linen Loft
27-37 Adelaide Street
Belfast , BT2 8FE UK
+44 28 9041 2888

Pensions Dashboards – the slow dash to connection

Insights

Pensions Dashboards - the slow dash to connection

You could be forgiven for thinking that the whole Pensions Dashboard thing has gone away.

Given the rate of progress since they were first announced it’s seemed less like a dash and more of a meandering walk.

 

To assume that Dashboards are dead would however be a big mistake. Recent intelligence suggests that the intent to progress remains and a new staging timetable isn’t far off.

 

How did we get here?

The Dashboards program was conceived to make it easy for people to find and view information about their pensions. A staging timetable was announced outlining when schemes would need to connect to the new infrastructure. The industry then set about meeting the not inconsiderable challenge. It soon became apparent that meeting the requirements and timetable would be exceedingly difficult for some schemes. The issues to be navigated included, and still do, Data quality, Digitisation of the data, Administrator technology, or lack of it Resource and budget. 

 

Feedback from many of the large administrators and platform providers was that it wasn’t achievable, at least not in the proposed timetable.

 

It wasn’t too much of a surprise when in June 2023 it was announced that there was to be a “pause”. No new timetable was announced but there was a new endpoint of 31st October 2026 for all in scope schemes to connect.

 

Despite the industry pressing for detail on when a new timetable would emerge and if anything, substantive would change, there has been little news. Recent noises, however, suggest that the announcement of a new timetable is just months off. April 2024 has been mentioned.

 

An 18-month dash?

The first schemes may well connect from April 2025. That means all schemes in scope will sit within an 18-month window ending October 2026.

 

What next?

Well basically all the things that have been flagged for action since Dashboards were first announced. There’s lots of good recent guidance on getting ready from PASA & the TPR, nothing new but a good prompt for schemes that aren’t yet there.

 

The key points are,

 

Make sure the underlying technology is up to the job of meeting The Dashboards requirements.

 

Get on top the data. It needs to be good enough to enable a match from a find message as well as supporting the calculation of an Estimated Retirement Income.

 

Communicate to members in advance of the staging date and ensure the administrator has a plan to handle the inevitable queries.

 

Watch for developments, looks like at last the pace is hotting up!

< Share my blog

Lets talk about you​

To discuss how we can help with your company pensions and challenges, please get in touch. 

 

Linen Loft
27-37 Adelaide Street
Belfast , BT2 8FE UK
+44 28 9041 2888